<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s New Rules Apply to Network Marketers!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.network-marketing-works.com/blog/googles-new-rules-apply-to-network-marketers-73/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.network-marketing-works.com/blog/googles-new-rules-apply-to-network-marketers-73/</link>
	<description>With thousands of network marketing blogs on the internet today, why read mine? If you&#039;re looking for a unique perspective without the hype and spin so common...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:19:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Burks</title>
		<link>http://www.network-marketing-works.com/blog/googles-new-rules-apply-to-network-marketers-73/comment-page-1/#comment-441</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Burks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.network-marketing-works.com/nmwblog/2008/02/26/googles-new-rules-apply-to-network-marketers/#comment-441</guid>
		<description>Hi Gregory,

It was not just these systems that Google was initially after, only to later relax their position. Amazing how a failing economy can make you change your position. 

Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft want to see relevant advertising tied to real websites not a bunch of clones. During the first round many where shocked when their clicks went from .25 - .40 to the six to ten dollar range.

I&#039;ve been teaching for years now how to build sites, yet most do not have the patience required to achieve any form of success. The are always looking for the latest gimmick or trick to achieve their goals.

Glenn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gregory,</p>
<p>It was not just these systems that Google was initially after, only to later relax their position. Amazing how a failing economy can make you change your position. </p>
<p>Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft want to see relevant advertising tied to real websites not a bunch of clones. During the first round many where shocked when their clicks went from .25 &#8211; .40 to the six to ten dollar range.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been teaching for years now how to build sites, yet most do not have the patience required to achieve any form of success. The are always looking for the latest gimmick or trick to achieve their goals.</p>
<p>Glenn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Elfrink</title>
		<link>http://www.network-marketing-works.com/blog/googles-new-rules-apply-to-network-marketers-73/comment-page-1/#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Elfrink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.network-marketing-works.com/nmwblog/2008/02/26/googles-new-rules-apply-to-network-marketers/#comment-440</guid>
		<description>Hey Glenn!


Excellent post. These systems you refer to are such things as Magnetic Sponsoring and the Renegade Marketer? Or the use of affiliate system lead generation tools?


All the best,
Gregory
PS. I&#039;ll have to look through those templates you found in your other post. My wordpress blog is depressingly bland in design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Glenn!</p>
<p>Excellent post. These systems you refer to are such things as Magnetic Sponsoring and the Renegade Marketer? Or the use of affiliate system lead generation tools?</p>
<p>All the best,<br />
Gregory<br />
PS. I&#8217;ll have to look through those templates you found in your other post. My wordpress blog is depressingly bland in design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
